0.00/0.02 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.07/0.35 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu 0.07/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.07/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.07/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB 0.07/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic 0.07/0.35 % CPULimit : 1440 0.07/0.35 % WCLimit : 180 0.07/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Jul 27 11:51:39 UTC 2026 0.07/0.35 % CPUTime : 0.07/0.35 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.12/0.39 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.12/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.sYaqZ47wWE/E---3.1_3605337.p 0.12/0.44 % Version: 3.5.1-ho 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNHHA. 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.12/0.44 % Starting full_lambda_6 with 540s (3) cores 0.12/0.44 % Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores 0.12/0.44 % Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 180s (1) cores 0.12/0.44 % Starting ho_unfolding_1 with 180s (1) cores 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 180s (1) cores 0.12/0.44 % Starting ho_unfolding_2 with 180s (1) cores 0.12/0.44 % full_lambda_6 with pid 3605350 completed with status 0 0.12/0.44 % Result found by full_lambda_6 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNHHA. 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.12/0.44 % Starting full_lambda_6 with 540s (3) cores 0.12/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true)) 0.12/0.44 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true) 0.12/0.44 % Search class: HGUSF-FFSF11-DHHFFMBN 0.12/0.44 % partial match(1): HGUSF-FFSF11-SHHFFMBN 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 540 seconds (540 total) 0.12/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 49s (1) cores 0.12/0.44 % Starting full_lambda_6 with 55s (1) cores 0.12/0.44 % Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 49s (1) cores 0.12/0.44 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3605357 completed with status 0 0.12/0.44 % Result found by SubtermCWHack 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNHHA. 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.12/0.44 % Starting full_lambda_6 with 540s (3) cores 0.12/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true)) 0.12/0.44 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true) 0.12/0.44 % Search class: HGUSF-FFSF11-DHHFFMBN 0.12/0.44 % partial match(1): HGUSF-FFSF11-SHHFFMBN 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 540 seconds (540 total) 0.12/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 49s (1) cores 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.12/0.44 0.12/0.44 % Proof found! 0.12/0.44 % SZS status Theorem 0.12/0.44 % SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.12/0.44 thf(decl_sort1, type, a: $tType). 0.12/0.44 thf(decl_23, type, epred1_0: (a > a > $o) > $o). 0.12/0.44 thf(decl_24, type, esk1_0: a). 0.12/0.44 thf(decl_25, type, esk2_0: a). 0.12/0.44 thf(decl_26, type, esk3_1: (a > a > $o) > a). 0.12/0.44 thf(decl_27, type, esk4_1: (a > a > $o) > a). 0.12/0.44 thf(decl_28, type, esk5_1: (a > a > $o) > a). 0.12/0.44 thf(decl_29, type, esk6_1: (a > a > $o) > a). 0.12/0.44 thf(decl_30, type, esk7_1: (a > a > $o) > a). 0.12/0.44 thf(decl_31, type, epred2_1: (a > a > $o) > a > a > $o). 0.12/0.44 thf(decl_32, type, epred3_0: a > a > $o). 0.12/0.44 thf(decl_33, type, epred4_3: a > a > (a > a > $o) > a > a > $o). 0.12/0.44 thf(cTHM253_A_pme, conjecture, ![X1:(a > a > $o) > $o, X2:a, X3:a]:((![X4:a > a > $o]:(((![X5:a, X6:a, X7:a]:(((X4 @ X5 @ X7)<=((X4 @ X6 @ X7)&(X4 @ X5 @ X6))))&![X5:a, X6:a]:(((X4 @ X5 @ X6)<=?[X8:a > a > $o]:(((X1 @ X8)&(X8 @ X5 @ X6))))))=>(X4 @ X2 @ X3)))=>![X4:a > a > $o]:(((![X5:a, X6:a, X7:a]:(((X4 @ X5 @ X7)<=((X4 @ X5 @ X6)&(X4 @ X6 @ X7))))&![X5:a, X6:a]:(((X4 @ X5 @ X6)<=?[X8:a > a > $o]:((?[X9:a > a > $o]:((((X8)=(^[X10:a, X11:a]:(![X12:a > a > $o]:(((((![X13:a, X14:a]:((((X12 @ X13 @ X14))<=((X9 @ X13 @ X14)))))&(![X13:a, X14:a, X7:a]:((((((X12 @ X13 @ X14))&((X12 @ X14 @ X7))))=>((X12 @ X13 @ X7)))))))=>((X12 @ X10 @ X11)))))))&(X1 @ X9)))&(X8 @ X5 @ X6))))))=>(X4 @ X2 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.sYaqZ47wWE/E---3.1_3605337.p', cTHM253_A_pme)). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:(a > a > $o) > $o, X2:a, X3:a]:((![X4:a > a > $o]:(((![X5:a, X6:a, X7:a]:(((X4 @ X5 @ X7)<=((X4 @ X6 @ X7)&(X4 @ X5 @ X6))))&![X5:a, X6:a]:(((X4 @ X5 @ X6)<=?[X8:a > a > $o]:(((X1 @ X8)&(X8 @ X5 @ X6))))))=>(X4 @ X2 @ X3)))=>![X4:a > a > $o]:(((![X5:a, X6:a, X7:a]:(((X4 @ X5 @ X7)<=((X4 @ X5 @ X6)&(X4 @ X6 @ X7))))&![X5:a, X6:a]:(((X4 @ X5 @ X6)<=?[X8:a > a > $o]:((?[X9:a > a > $o]:((((X8)=(^[X10:a, X11:a]:(![X12:a > a > $o]:(((((![X13:a, X14:a]:((((X12 @ X13 @ X14))<=((X9 @ X13 @ X14)))))&(![X13:a, X14:a, X7:a]:((((((X12 @ X13 @ X14))&((X12 @ X14 @ X7))))=>((X12 @ X13 @ X7)))))))=>((X12 @ X10 @ X11)))))))&(X1 @ X9)))&(X8 @ X5 @ X6))))))=>(X4 @ X2 @ X3)))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM253_A_pme])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:(a > a > $o) > $o, X2:a, X3:a]:((![X4:a > a > $o]:(((![X5:a, X6:a, X7:a]:((((X4 @ X6 @ X7)&(X4 @ X5 @ X6))=>(X4 @ X5 @ X7)))&![X5:a, X6:a]:((?[X8:a > a > $o]:(((X1 @ X8)&(X8 @ X5 @ X6)))=>(X4 @ X5 @ X6))))=>(X4 @ X2 @ X3)))=>![X4:a > a > $o]:(((![X5:a, X6:a, X7:a]:((((X4 @ X5 @ X6)&(X4 @ X6 @ X7))=>(X4 @ X5 @ X7)))&![X5:a, X6:a]:((?[X8:a > a > $o]:((?[X9:a > a > $o]:((((X8)=(^[Z0:a, Z1:a]:(![X12:a > a > $o]:(((((![X13:a, X14:a]:(((X12 @ X13 @ X14)<=(X9 @ X13 @ X14))))&(![X13:a, X14:a, X7:a]:(((((X12 @ X13 @ X14)&(X12 @ X14 @ X7)))=>(X12 @ X13 @ X7))))))=>(X12 @ Z0 @ Z1))))))&(X1 @ X9)))&(X8 @ X5 @ X6)))=>(X4 @ X5 @ X6))))=>(X4 @ X2 @ X3)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X36:a > a > $o, X44:a, X45:a, X46:a, X47:a, X48:a, X49:a > a > $o, X50:a > a > $o]:((((((((epred1_0 @ (epred2_1 @ X36))|(X36 @ (esk4_1 @ X36) @ (esk5_1 @ X36))|(X36 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0))&((epred2_1 @ X36 @ (esk6_1 @ X36) @ (esk7_1 @ X36))|(X36 @ (esk4_1 @ X36) @ (esk5_1 @ X36))|(X36 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)))&(~(X36 @ (esk6_1 @ X36) @ (esk7_1 @ X36))|(X36 @ (esk4_1 @ X36) @ (esk5_1 @ X36))|(X36 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)))&((((epred1_0 @ (epred2_1 @ X36))|(X36 @ (esk3_1 @ X36) @ (esk4_1 @ X36))|(X36 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0))&((epred2_1 @ X36 @ (esk6_1 @ X36) @ (esk7_1 @ X36))|(X36 @ (esk3_1 @ X36) @ (esk4_1 @ X36))|(X36 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)))&(~(X36 @ (esk6_1 @ X36) @ (esk7_1 @ X36))|(X36 @ (esk3_1 @ X36) @ (esk4_1 @ X36))|(X36 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0))))&((((epred1_0 @ (epred2_1 @ X36))|~(X36 @ (esk3_1 @ X36) @ (esk5_1 @ X36))|(X36 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0))&((epred2_1 @ X36 @ (esk6_1 @ X36) @ (esk7_1 @ X36))|~(X36 @ (esk3_1 @ X36) @ (esk5_1 @ X36))|(X36 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)))&(~(X36 @ (esk6_1 @ X36) @ (esk7_1 @ X36))|~(X36 @ (esk3_1 @ X36) @ (esk5_1 @ X36))|(X36 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0))))&(((~(epred3_0 @ X44 @ X45)|~(epred3_0 @ X45 @ X46)|(epred3_0 @ X44 @ X46))&(((X49)!=(^[Z0:a, Z1:a]:(![X12:a > a > $o]:(((((![X13:a, X14:a]:(((X12 @ X13 @ X14)<=(X50 @ X13 @ X14))))&(![X13:a, X14:a, X7:a]:(((((X12 @ X13 @ X14)&(X12 @ X14 @ X7)))=>(X12 @ X13 @ X7))))))=>(X12 @ Z0 @ Z1))))))|~(epred1_0 @ X50)|~(X49 @ X47 @ X48)|(epred3_0 @ X47 @ X48)))&~(epred3_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a > a > $o, X6:a, X9:a > a > $o, X7:a]:(((epred3_0 @ X6 @ X7)|((X4)!=(^[Z0:a, Z1:a]:(![X66:a > a > $o]:(((((![X67:a, X68:a]:((((X66 @ X67 @ X68))<=((X9 @ X67 @ X68)))))&(![X69:a, X70:a, X71:a]:((((((X66 @ X69 @ X70))&((X66 @ X70 @ X71))))=>((X66 @ X69 @ X71)))))))=>((X66 @ Z0 @ Z1)))))))|~((epred1_0 @ X9))|~((X4 @ X6 @ X7)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a, X3:a, X4:a > a > $o]:(((epred3_0 @ X2 @ X3)|~(![X72:a > a > $o]:(((![X73:a, X74:a]:(((X72 @ X73 @ X74)<=(X4 @ X73 @ X74)))&![X75:a, X76:a, X77:a]:((((X72 @ X75 @ X76)&(X72 @ X76 @ X77))=>(X72 @ X75 @ X77))))=>(X72 @ X2 @ X3))))|~((epred1_0 @ X4)))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a, X3:a, X4:a > a > $o]:(((epred3_0 @ X2 @ X3)|~((epred4_3 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X2 @ X3))|~((epred1_0 @ X4)))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a, X3:a, X6:a, X5:a, X4:a > a > $o]:(((epred4_3 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5 @ X6)|(epred3_0 @ X2 @ X3)|~((X4 @ X5 @ X6))|~((epred1_0 @ X4)))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a, X4:a > a > $o, X3:a]:(((epred3_0 @ X2 @ X3)|~((epred1_0 @ X4))|~((X4 @ X2 @ X3)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a > a > $o]:(((epred2_1 @ X4 @ (esk6_1 @ X4) @ (esk7_1 @ X4))|(X4 @ (esk4_1 @ X4) @ (esk5_1 @ X4))|(X4 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a > a > $o]:(((epred1_0 @ (epred2_1 @ X4))|(X4 @ (esk4_1 @ X4) @ (esk5_1 @ X4))|(X4 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a > a > $o]:(((X4 @ (esk4_1 @ X4) @ (esk5_1 @ X4))|(X4 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)|~((X4 @ (esk6_1 @ X4) @ (esk7_1 @ X4))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a > a > $o]:(((epred3_0 @ (esk6_1 @ X4) @ (esk7_1 @ X4))|(X4 @ (esk4_1 @ X4) @ (esk5_1 @ X4))|(X4 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9]), c_0_10])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ~((epred3_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a > a > $o]:(((epred2_1 @ X4 @ (esk6_1 @ X4) @ (esk7_1 @ X4))|(X4 @ (esk3_1 @ X4) @ (esk4_1 @ X4))|(X4 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a > a > $o]:(((epred1_0 @ (epred2_1 @ X4))|(X4 @ (esk3_1 @ X4) @ (esk4_1 @ X4))|(X4 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a > a > $o]:(((epred2_1 @ X4 @ (esk6_1 @ X4) @ (esk7_1 @ X4))|(X4 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)|~((X4 @ (esk3_1 @ X4) @ (esk5_1 @ X4))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a > a > $o]:(((epred1_0 @ (epred2_1 @ X4))|(X4 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)|~((X4 @ (esk3_1 @ X4) @ (esk5_1 @ X4))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a, X3:a, X5:a]:(((epred3_0 @ X2 @ X5)|~((epred3_0 @ X2 @ X3))|~((epred3_0 @ X3 @ X5)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, (epred3_0 @ (esk4_1 @ epred3_0) @ (esk5_1 @ epred3_0)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12]), c_0_13])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a > a > $o]:(((X4 @ (esk3_1 @ X4) @ (esk4_1 @ X4))|(X4 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)|~((X4 @ (esk6_1 @ X4) @ (esk7_1 @ X4))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a > a > $o]:(((epred3_0 @ (esk6_1 @ X4) @ (esk7_1 @ X4))|(X4 @ (esk3_1 @ X4) @ (esk4_1 @ X4))|(X4 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_14]), c_0_15])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a > a > $o]:(((epred3_0 @ (esk6_1 @ X4) @ (esk7_1 @ X4))|(X4 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)|~((X4 @ (esk3_1 @ X4) @ (esk5_1 @ X4))))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_16]), c_0_17])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a]:(((epred3_0 @ X2 @ (esk5_1 @ epred3_0))|~((epred3_0 @ X2 @ (esk4_1 @ epred3_0))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, (epred3_0 @ (esk3_1 @ epred3_0) @ (esk4_1 @ epred3_0)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21]), c_0_13])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a > a > $o]:(((X4 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)|~((X4 @ (esk6_1 @ X4) @ (esk7_1 @ X4)))|~((X4 @ (esk3_1 @ X4) @ (esk5_1 @ X4))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, (epred3_0 @ (esk6_1 @ epred3_0) @ (esk7_1 @ epred3_0)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_23]), c_0_24])]), c_0_13])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, ~((epred3_0 @ (esk3_1 @ epred3_0) @ (esk5_1 @ epred3_0))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26]), c_0_13])). 0.12/0.44 thf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_23]), c_0_24])]), ['proof']). 0.12/0.44 % SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.12/0.44 % Parsed axioms : 2 0.12/0.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1 0.12/0.44 % Initial clauses : 12 0.12/0.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.12/0.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 12 0.12/0.44 % Processed clauses : 52 0.12/0.44 % ...of these trivial : 3 0.12/0.44 % ...subsumed : 9 0.12/0.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 40 0.12/0.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1 0.12/0.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.12/0.44 % Backward-subsumed : 0 0.12/0.44 % Backward-rewritten : 3 0.12/0.44 % Generated clauses : 83 0.12/0.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 65 0.12/0.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.12/0.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 3 0.12/0.44 % Paramodulations : 79 0.12/0.44 % Factorizations : 0 0.12/0.44 % NegExts : 0 0.12/0.44 % Equation resolutions : 1 0.12/0.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0 0.12/0.44 % Total rewrite steps : 25 0.12/0.44 % ...of those cached : 21 0.12/0.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.12/0.44 % Propositional check models : 0 0.12/0.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.12/0.44 % Propositional clauses : 0 0.12/0.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.12/0.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.12/0.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.12/0.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.12/0.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.12/0.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.12/0.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.12/0.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.12/0.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 35 0.12/0.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4 0.12/0.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.12/0.44 % Negative unit clauses : 2 0.12/0.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 29 0.12/0.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 22 0.12/0.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 110 0.12/0.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.12/0.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 4 0.12/0.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 201 0.12/0.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 126 0.12/0.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 12 0.12/0.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24 0.12/0.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.12/0.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1 0.12/0.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 1 0.12/0.44 % Condensation attempts : 0 0.12/0.44 % Condensation successes : 0 0.12/0.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 4153 0.12/0.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 562 0.12/0.44 0.12/0.44 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.12/0.44 % User time : 0.008 s 0.12/0.44 % System time : 0.004 s 0.12/0.44 % Total time : 0.012 s 0.12/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages 0.12/0.44 0.12/0.44 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.12/0.44 % User time : 0.029 s 0.12/0.44 % System time : 0.011 s 0.12/0.44 % Total time : 0.040 s 0.12/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages 0.12/0.44 % E exiting 0.12/0.44 EOF